Digital 101 in Three Parts: Part Three

The Way to Campaign in a COVID-19 World.
The Way to Campaign, Period.

What is a winning campaign message? It is a message that wins the election. It is a message that persuades a majority (or plurality) of voters to trust a candidate to look out for them. It is a message that says, “I got your back, you can trust me.” It is a message that resonates.

Resonance

More than anything, the campaign message should resonate with voters. Voters are human beings, each with a life full of joy and sorrow, success and disappointment, love and loss. A voter’s life usually requires hard work and almost certainly involves a good deal of anxiety. It is, without a doubt, impacted by daily stressors. And for all its triumphs and delights, it is also disrupted by many forces that are beyond any one person’s control, and by some that are not.

A message that resonates will tap into voters’ emotions and elicit a feeling. A voter will feel that the candidate understands her or at least understands the kinds of trials and tribulations that pepper her life. A voter may sense sympathy, maybe empathy from the candidate. A voter may hear anger in the candidate and identify with that. A voter will feel that the candidate just might grasp what she is going through. A voter will feel excited or safe or hopeful or cathartic.

With a resonant message, a voter will believe that the candidate is perceptive, has insight into his world, is sensitive to his frustrations and fears and pains. He will feel a connection to the candidate, will feel that he and the candidate share something

important in common. He will trust the candidate. I won’t go into the importance of trust right now, I’ll just say that TRUST IS EVERYTHING. And when you boil it all down, one way for a candidate to win the trust of a voter is to establish a meaningful connection. And the way to do that is more often through the heart than the head.

Passion

If we are targeting emotions, it is necessary to examine what voters, especially swing voters, are feeling this year. Frustration, first and foremost. Anger. Fear. Anticipation. More frustration. Exhaustion. And some sadness and loneliness. We all feel an overwhelming need for a leader who can bring order from chaos and return us to a world that only ever existed in our American dreams.

For Joe Biden, this means crafting a message that conveys strength, confidence, command, and kindness. It will draw on his strengths, be true to who he is, and provide what everyone in the country needs.

While the campaign message should be something of a loner (one message, not many messages, definitely not a laundry list), that does not mean that policy issue cannot be addressed. A website can summarize policy positions and link to white papers; candidate questionnaires, journalists, and opinion pages can flush out the tough issues; and social-media campaign soldiers can cover everything from the candidate’s favorite candy to data points on his or her voting record. But the message should convey feeling because the goal is to create a message that wins the campaign, not an argument.

When it comes to the day-to-day on social media, the candidate should convey a sense of humor (if funny, be funny, if not, add levity and enjoy other people being funny). Be clever, not mean. And take advantage of opportunities quickly. As noted by David Plouffe and David Axelrod, after the President mused about using disinfectant “by injection inside,” the Biden campaign shot off a great little video: “This is a cup of Lysol. It is poison. Please do not drink it.”

Content is King

As Bill Gates predicted back in 1996, content is king. 

What are the options? Speeches, op-eds, event announcements. Live hangouts (maybe a backyard BBQ with the candidate at the helm) and virtual pressers (with presentations, videos, pics, etc.). Gifs & cartoons because laughter and smiles are good. Make the most of viral moments by sharing them with clever quips and poignant pronouncements. Virtual tours peppered with stories (ideas for the Biden campaign: VP Biden narrates a virtual tour of Scranton, commute to the Capitol, “bar hop” through Delaware, walk through his Delaware home (today we’re visiting the living room, join us tomorrow when we venture out to the family room!). Share posts (feel-good, funny, political, public interest, informative), articles, and all kinds of volunteer, community, and other user-generated content. Virtual town halls (with video questions from voters or from within gaming platforms—get creative!). Livestream a Fortnite one v. one with a young voter, let the competition begin.

Candidates can live-stream interviews as interviewee and as interviewer. In fact, I believe that candidates should take as many interviews as possible on television, radio, possibly YouTube shows, and

definitely podcasts. Do the interview, say something worth repeating, share the interview. Repeat.

Candidates can also host their own podcasts where they interview community activists, fellow politicians, policy experts, or maybe their mom—no matter what, have fun with it. Make sure your candidate’s podcast is findable on Stitcher, Spotify, Overcast, and the iTunes and Google podcast apps. Place ads on others’ podcasts if they’ll have you. And be sure to keep up to date with what’s hot in the worlds of entertainment and sports.

Targeting

In campaigning 101, they (yes, them) teach candidates and staff to identify how many votes are needed to win (50 + 1 + a few more, just to be safe) and from whom in the district those votes may be found. This is about identifying your audiences, or in this case, your voters (for instance, suburban women, union members, people who voted for President Trump in 2016 and a Democratic congressmember in 2018, and lifelong Democrats). Then, for each of your targeted audiences, determine whether you want to persuade them to vote for you, simply motivate them to vote, or mobilize them to vote, volunteer, and organize.

A/B Testing

Once you work all this out, ideally you will want to use social media to target potential voters with nuanced variations of the campaign message (as applied to different issues, by varying the wording, using modified designs), each one targeted to a different audience or even to specific voters. A/B testing is one way to determine which messages work best with each of your audiences. A/B testing is a method for comparing the effectiveness of two versions of an ad that differ only subtly and in only one respect. The ad that performs best with that audience is the one you’ll run because it has been shown to be most likely to give you your desired outcome, in this case, votes. Some of the social media platforms, such as Facebook, take A/B testing to the next level.

Facebook’s Loom of Gold

Facebook’s algorithms do A/B testing on steroids, not only testing many multiple variations of ads, but taking it one step further and making the adjustments to the ads based on performance results (data analytics). In this way, micro-audiences receive messages that are particularly well-suited to persuade them. Ian Bogost and Alexis C. Madrigal explain how it works in the Atlantic. Suffice it to say that you can create a very simple, low-cost digital ad that isn’t much more than a Facebook post with a pic or 6-second video, pay Facebook a hundred bucks per ad buy, provide Facebook a bunch of custom audiences from which to start (some of which may be grouped by interest area, all of which contain information that is used to create variants of the original ad), and have Facebook work its algorithmic magic like the inexhaustible Rumpelstiltzkin weaving hay into gold.

“Facebook’s ad software doesn’t try to get someone to buy a product or vote for a candidate. It merely tries to produce the results that advertisers [and candidates] declare they want…. Each action a user takes or doesn’t take—clicking, liking, sharing, commenting, donating, hovering, buying, filling out a form—slightly changes the complex network of predictions that form Facebook’s picture of a person, which is to say, a [voter].”

Hire digital gurus, find digital guru volunteers, or turn to the social media platforms themselves for assistance. I highly recommend watching the 60 Minutes interview of Brad Parscale in which President Trump’s 2016 digital director (2020 campaign manager) downloads just how they made the most of what social media had to offer and got millions of people who had never voted or who had been voting Democratic to vote for a hotel/reality-TV personality on the Republican ticket.

Learn From Your President In Order to Defeat Your President

Now, Donald Trump may not be the sharpest crayon in the box generally speaking, but when it comes to propaganda, he is a savant. Our president is someone who understands what the masses want on the most visceral level (he is from Queens, after all). In 2016, he knew what kinds of messages his target audience wanted to hear, and he knew enough to hire a digital director who could drill down on this and make the most of it. Facebook and other platforms not only amplified his message, it helped sculpt his message for maximum return. I believe that the role of Facebook, in particular, in getting Donald Trump elected president cannot be overstated.

When you boil it all down, it’s about getting access to eyeballs. Facebook has automated this process. Assume your campaign knows that Republican women in Orange County who are concerned about school shootings just might entertain voting for a Democrat. You therefore need to identify and reach these women and people like them. One good place to do this is on Facebook where the campaign can send them a particularly persuasive ad about responsible spending and responsible gun control. The Facebook recipe includes data about user behavior, artificial intelligence, and fancy pants computer programming to do just this. It’s a dizzying combination of targeting, micro-targeting, and broadside blanketing using dozens of variants of an ad (yes, it is narrow and it is wide). And they kind of get your campaign addicted to it, the Candy Crush of digital campaigning, as you spend more and more to reach voters you otherwise would never reach. In the case of the Trump campaign, it was and still is money well spent. The Biden campaign would be derelict not to take advantage of this, no matter how distasteful it is to feed Facebook’s coffers (that, my friends, is a battle for another day). Embrace it.

Digital 101 in Three Parts: Part One

The Way to Campaign in a COVID-19 World.
The Way to Campaign, Period.

America could be open for business by this autumn. Or not. Or maybe we’ll be open for business this summer and then close up again this fall. Or this winter. Really, nobody knows.

I’m going to start with some assumptions: 1) Most or all of America will be open for business this summer. We’ll be social distancing, at first, and wearing face masks, some of us, at first. We’ll become a bit more relaxed after a month or two, and by September, we’ll appear to be back to normal. However, we won’t really be back to normal because, and this leads us into assumption number….  2) Most or all Americans will be worrying about a resurgence of the virus during flu season. I am going to make another assumption here, number 3) that the virus will return just before Christmas and last into February. Finally, my last assumption, number 4) is that flu season will begin in mid-October, a couple of months before coronavirus hits again, but everyone who gets the flu, or a cold, don’t forget about cold season, will likely worry that they’ve contracted COVID-19 and anxiety levels will be…elevated. I make these assumptions based on, well, a bunch of stuff I’ve read. There is one indisputable fact, however: the presidential election will be held November 3

What do we know about the campaign environment during a pandemic? We know that as some voters wear masks and some do not, some keep 6 feet away and other do not, there will be stigmas associated with whichever way you choose to go. Oh joy.

What does this tell us about about campaign strategy in 2020? Door-to-door campaigning, registration drives, and GOTV, gone. Door hangers, problematic. Rallies, maybe Trump rallies. Meet & greets, not so much. Church visits, they’re going to be small or virtual, unless they’re not. Dropping by the diner on Route 27 as voters eat their eggs and sausage, probably not appreciated. Shaking hands and kissing babies, unacceptable.

Traditionally, it’s through canvassing that campaigns figure out where they stand and what they need to do to reach the finish line by identifying voters who enthusiastically support the candidate, voters who make it clear that it will be a cold day in hell before they vote for the candidate, and voters who just cannot decide. Knocking on doors to collect this information, precinct by precinct, in order to rule out the cold-day-in-hell cohort, persuade the undecideds, and motivate the fervent to volunteer, organize, and vote is the bread and butter of a campaign. Campaigns need armies of volunteers to do the work, even if it all goes digital. Without in-person events, late-night bonding among campaign workers and volunteers, and snack-fueled house and debate parties, how will campaigns keep everyone excited and engaged? Without the Party convention to kick off the season, how will campaigns build momentum? We humans get excited when we’re close to one another (and, for some reason, when it’s really loud)—it’s biology, it’s conditioning, whatever it is, it’s true. So, what do we do?

Ok, now we have our parameters. Campaigns involve a lot of human contact, COVID-19 may, but the flu certainly will, return weeks before the election, and this is the most important election of our lifetimes. What’s a campaign to do?

Digital

If you thought, “Digital!” you are not wrong. Go digital like a Trump campaign. Zoom! We’re gonna zoom 🎶 we’re gonna zoom-a zoom-a zoom-a zoom 🎶 we’re gonna teach you to fly…but I digress. Post digital content to YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Snapchat, and maybe Stitch (Fortnite, anyone?). Have I mentioned TikTok? Become one with the ether.

Even before COVID-19, digital had become crucial to successful campaigning. President Trump, Republicans, and Fox et al. have been waging propaganda warfare, with varying degrees of success, for 4 (to 28) years, but it was Donald Trump and his digitally-enhanced campaign who took it home. Even the assist from Russia was digital. If Democrats (read: Biden) do not embrace digital communications right now, our lemming friends on the other side of the aisle will be empowered to dive into the rabbit hole for another 4 (to 28) years and may very well take democracy and our great nation down with them. Digital.

So, what does this mean for Democrats in 2020? From Obama to Trump to O’Rourke to Buttigieg, campaigns have been applying digital technology for several cycles now, each cycle’s tactics more sophisticated than the last. But not all Democrats have ridden the digital wave. Some campaigns like Obama’s in 2008 and Buttigieg’s in 2020 invent the wheel (it rolls!), some like Obama’s in 2012 and O’Rourke’s in 2018 and Sanders in 2020 make very good use of the wheel (you can use several at once and attach stuff!), but some insist on trudging along, one jerry can at a time. Now is the moment for all Democrats to hop on the hay cart.

I am going to address three aspects of digital messaging: mode & medium, messenger, and message. In this first part, I’ll address mode & medium, by which I mean the how of it all, how a campaign communicates its message to voters (video, pics, graphics, gifs, text, and voice) and through which method of broadcast (social media and peer-to-peer communications). In Part 2, which will appear in my next blog, I’ll consider the messengers (candidate, surrogates, paid supporters, and an army of campaign workers and volunteers fit with not much more than their phones, laptops, and imaginations). In Part 3, which will appear in the following blog, I will discuss the message, the words, images, and manner that define a campaign and create a bond between the candidate and voters. Let’s jump in.

Mode & Medium

There are a lot of social media platforms, channels, applications, and tools out there. Settle in, get cozy, and put on your best skimming glasses

Home Base

Websites. Campaigns should invest in a well-designed site. Definitely ensure that your site can be found easily by putting some effort into SEO (search engine optimization). Hire someone to create your site, pick a do-it-yourself website design platform like Wix, Squarespace, WordPress, or one geared to campaigns like PoliEngine, or if you are using full-service, campaign software like NationBuilder, take advantage of its web design feature. Make sure your pick includes outreach and fundraising tools, translates well to mobile display, and will allow for quick load times. I also recommend using a micro-site. A typical micro-site is a stand-alone web page that exists independent of the website and serves as a candidate’s summary page. I would expand on this traditional purpose and use a micro-site as a sort of home base that links visitors to everything available on the campaign website. I got this idea from a website hosted not by a campaign, but by a Pete Buttigieg supporter who created The Pete Channel, a website that hosts videos, pics, issue summaries, podcasts, articles, and sundry other campaign-related things. I think that campaigns themselves should create sites like this and use them as a digital home base that has a clean, intuitive design and includes links to the following elements:

The Masses

What else do you need? Social media, of course. First and foremost, Facebook, Facebook, Facebook. It may not seem cutting edge, it may be the dinosaur of social media platforms because it pretty much invented social media, but it is, as Stefan Smith says, the yellow pages of the modern era. Fully two-thirds of the planet and 70% or 170 million U.S. adults use Facebook (85% of adults under 50). Even folks over 65 use Facebook. Even folks over 75 use Facebook. Of seniors who are online, 62% use it. I would argue that without Facebook, Trump would not have won the presidency. (Of course, without James Comey, Trump would not have won the presidency either. It’s always something.) The Trump campaign, namely Brad Parscale, made the most of Facebook by accepting their offer to train campaign staff how to use its every feature, in real time. For instance, the Trump campaign learned how to place Facebook ads that target specifically-defined audiences, but they also learned that they could tell Facebook what they hoped to achieve with an ad and Facebook’s algorithm would determine the audience(s) and which of about a hundred subtle variations on the ad to use for each audience. It worked. Let’s learn from it.

Second, YouTube. Even more people use YouTube (180 million Americans and over 70% of people 55 and under). People spend hours and hours watching YouTube videos of fails and beauty tips and soccer and parkour and babies falling over and puppies making messes and clever backyard rollercoasters and movie clips and, God help us all, smoking toddlers. You missed the last Colbert, Oliver, or Saturday Night Live? Catch it on YouTube. Post video of the candidate. Share video content. Create video content. Place YouTube ads, like Pre-Roll ads and TrueView’s Bumper and In-Stream ads. Above all, make use of YouTube.

The Influencers

Twitter is also a useful platform for campaigns, but in a different way. Only about 22% of adults in the U.S. (about 50 million) use Twitter, 64% are under 50, 66% are male, and the demographics skew to the more affluent/educated/engaged. But what happens on Twitter does not stay on Twitter. Tweets impact the national political conversation by influencing journalists, politicians, and others who directly and indirectly determine what will be covered in the news. Plus, Tweets often migrate to Facebook within 48 hours and then head over to late night, MSNBC, CNN, and FOX, making Twitter the canary in the coal mine of social media (thanks again to Stefan Smith). Twitter is where you influence the influencers. Let them know your campaign has a pulse. Be pithy. Be clever. Move over Murrow, Cronkite, Jennings/Brokaw/Rather, and Muir, nearly three quarters of Twitter users get their news on this platform. But remember, to make Twitter work for a campaign, the campaign and its volunteers must produce content.

LinkedIn is the stodgiest of the social media platforms, but it has its place and, as with its adoptive parent Microsoft, that place is in the (virtual) office. LinkedIn is for grown-ups (167 million or two thirds of U.S. adults), and by that I mean, useful and less fun. Save your video posts for the other social media platforms because on LinkedIn, articles without videos perform better (only 24% of users hail from the 18-24 crowd), as do posts with 5, 7, or 9 headings and article titles of 40-49 characters. Nearly a quarter of users are influencers and decision-makers, half are college graduates. It is also male dominated (57% men vs. 43% women). Like business. And politics. For now.

The Young & The Restless

Instagram is the place for sharing visuals in the arenas of beauty, art, nature, pets, personal moments, and achievements. It a place for celebration, encouragement, and sometimes sympathy. A campaign’s content should follow suit. It is also a good place to promote events. Its U.S. adult audience is half the size of Facebook’s and YouTube’s, but it is bigger than Twitter’s, capturing about 37% or 90 million U.S. adults (and 72% of U.S. teens, so watch your content). It is also a shopping gateway, making it great for brand awareness, so place some ads (Story Ads, Photo Ads, Video Ads, Carousel Ads, Collection Ads, and Explore Ads). All in all, it is good way to reach an audience that may not otherwise tune in to the political conversation, an opportunity to connect with potential voters.

Pinterest, like Instagram, is more focused on human interest, specifically of the home. About 88 million U.S. adults use Pinterest, including 80% of American mothers (over 70% of all users are female, which makes this an important platform this election cycle). Photo and video Pins feature home improvement, arts & crafts, sewing, knitting, baking, cooking, decorating, teaching, celebrating holidays, and so on. Campaigns can take advantage of this with light-hearted videos featuring the stay-at-home-bound life of the candidate baking, barbecuing, reading to kids, gardening, fixing up that classic car, or building something around the house. Of course, ads are also an option. I’d like to see Joe Biden narrate a virtual tour of Scranton peppered with stories of his youth (family time, 10-year old Biden exploring with friends, 16-year old Biden getting into trouble with friends). Our former Vice President is a likable guy—his campaign should be able to make much of the Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest platforms in this way.

Snapchat also reaches a young audience and can be helpful to a campaign. As many people use Snapchat as use Twitter (86 million users in the U.S.), but it’s a fresh, young audience (while 78% are 18-24, note that 90% are 13-24, so, as with Instagram, make sure your content is appropriate). Snapchat is used for making personal connections, something all candidates should strive to do. It can be used to promote events, encourage voter registration, and get out the vote, as well as for ads. Gifs, stickers, drawings, and the like make Snapchat fun. Get creative with Snapstreak as a tool for volunteers as it keeps track of how many consecutive days a user has kept up an exchange with a friend (or a potential voter!), giving the conversation elements of a game. And while using Our Story to crowdsource Snaps taken at rallies, protests, and other live political events may be impractical this year, that doesn’t mean that this feature can’t be used for virtual events. Use it to better create the effect of a live event by crowdsourcing photos and videos taken by voters and other participants (in their living rooms, kitchens, and backyards) during a virtual event. However, beware of Snap Map—it reveals the users’ physical locations, which this year may be their homes, so it might be best if campaigns only encourage Our Story crowdsourcing if there is a way to ensure that users are in Ghost Mode.

Another youth-oriented platform is Twitch, which is focused on gamers (80% of whom are male, many of whom are young, so probably not swing-voter rich, but helpful for youth turnout). Placing ads in games is also a smart way to go (think Fortnite, Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto, World of Warcraft, but take note of the guns, bloodshed, and thievery and make your decisions accordingly!). Short ads can also be placed in the word and puzzle games we all play on our smart phones

And then there is TikTok. TikTok is complicated. TikTok doesn’t allow political ads, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t political activity. Users, many of them teenagers, set up Hype Houses or political coalitions that function like cable TV channels for teen viewers with the attention spans of, well, Gen Z teenagers, some leaning right, some left, some straddling the political middle. Each TikTok is no more than 60 seconds long, and while much of the debate is honest, some of it has been invaded by disinformation and conspiracy theories, but that is true for most social media platforms.

Discord, another gaming-focused platform, has started to broaden its horizons into the world of neighborhood chats (think Slack but skews younger and more about community than business). Teenagers make up a vast majority of users and chat with each other on servers. The servers contain channels that host video-voice-text chat groups moderated and administered by one or more users in settings that are as private or public as desired—it is opt-in, not a scrolling feed. A year ago it had 250 million users. Campaigns should be aware of relevant servers on Discord and could consider using it in place of Slack for younger campaign volunteers reaching out to their peers.

Finally, if you can find a digital guru who understands the cross-platform opportunities afforded by social media (for example, posting from an Instagram meme account to a Pinterest board), you can make even more of the opportunities offered by social media.

Broadcast News

As for broadcasting platforms, each has its own features and restrictions, so compare your options. Here’s an overview: Facebook Live can only be viewed by people with Facebook accounts; YouTube Live is geared toward computers unless you are a YouTube subscriber with at least 1,000 followers; Twitter Live and Periscope (owned by Twitter) allow live streaming only from mobile devices, but users can invite up to 3 guests to join via audio; Instagram Live allows streaming only from mobile devices, but you can invite one guest to participate via split screen; LinkedIn Live is available for Pages as well as individual accounts, but beware that you do have to apply to become a LinkedIn Live Broadcaster, so plan ahead; and third-party apps like Switcher, StreamYard, Vimeo, Socialive, Restream, and BeLive are sometimes necessary (costs range from $0 to $20 to $75 to $350/month) but have advantages like simulcasting, talk-show effects, and the integration of text, images, and video. Do the research, and think about investing in a couple of pieces of inexpensive equipment, like a decent webcam and a mic.

Of course, you've got to have something to broadcast, so here are a few of the many digital tools available for creating video: YouTube, BeLive, Magistro, Promo, WeVideo, Crello, Adobe Spark, Vimeo, Camtasia, Prezi Video, and Wistia. Also, Wistia’s Soapbox & Jotto (for user-generated content), PowToon (animation, graphics), PodBean (creating podcasts and videocasts), and Amazon’s Twitch (primarily for gamers).

Most of these platforms have options for broadcasting live events, as well, so take advantage…like when congressmembers show up at immigration detention centers with mobile video in hand to shed light on the Trump administration’s policy of ripping babies from their mother's arms to put them in cages…but again, I digress.

A plethora (isn’t that a lovely word? plethora…thank you, Miranda Hart) of apps and software will make your broadcasts smooth and not at all irritating. Nobody wants to watch and listen to glitchy broadcasts (Biden campaign, I’m talking to you, though kudos on getting Biden into a room with windows, please do it again).

All of these tools can help a campaign get its message out to thousands or millions of voters. Next question: Who should be posting these messages? Look for the answer in Digital 101: Part 2.

Appreciation for Republicans of Character

I feel the need to both share and publicly appreciate a recent endorsement of Joe Biden for President. The Lincoln Project, founded by Reed Galen and George Conway, published their endorsement of Biden in The Washington Post a couple of days ago. It is a beautifully written piece. It is simple and straightforward, presenting a compelling argument for the former Vice President. It talks about human decency, competency, and experience. It talks about a life shaped by heartache, a life that could have gone in a very, very different direction—that it didn’t, the authors credit to Biden’s perseverance and strength of character, both qualities the country, and the world, need now.

We humans are at a perilous juncture today. The United State of America doesn’t seem like the sure thing I’d grown up thinking it would always be, and as a result, we and the rest of the world are in danger. I don’t mean to sound apocalyptic, it’s not like that. It’s just that humanity periodically goes through very dark times, and I believe that those times come when strong leaders fall and great empires crumble. And for all of President Trump’s posturing and bluster, he is not a strong leader, and it feels like we may be about to crumble.

For about 100 years, the United States has led the world—through difficult times and into promising times. The last great struggle we faced, one that endangered great portions of the globe, was one of war and economic depression from WWI to WWII. While the 30 years this period lasted seems like a long time to most of us, historically speaking, it was a flash. Had we not been led by great governments and leaders in England and the United States, had Churchill not held the reins when he did, had FDR not raised American spirits and sent munitions and then men, had Donald Trump been president instead…well, that flash of 30 years may have turned into another Dark Age. Thanks to great leaders and great institutions, it didn’t. I believe that we are at another such crossroads today. I believe that what we, here in the United States, decide to do this November, could put the world on a trajectory either toward truly long-term tragedy or toward daylight.

It took brave, bold, and selfless leadership in the 1930’s and 40’s to ward off economic ruin and political terror. Today, we need competence, empathy, character, and grounded leadership to get back on our feet and then to do better than we were doing before. Galen, Conway, Schmidt, Wilson, Horn, Weaver, Madrid, and Steslow exhibit these qualities when they not only place country above party, but choose to value our country’s long-term survival over shorter-term policy choices. Some of them have left the Republican party, all of them have consistently spoken out against President Trump’s narcissism, self-aggrandizement, incompetence, and bald-faced manipulations of the press. All of them have spoken out against the majority of Republican leaders who have fallen in line with this president.

This is a group of lifelong Republicans and Conservatives who have based their careers on championing Republican issues and candidates. They, and others like Nicolle Wallace, Bill Kristol, Joe Scarborough, Charlie Sykes, Stuart Stevens, David Frum, Tara Setmayer, David Brooks, Michael Steele, Joe Walsh, Tom Nichols, Justin Amash, Tim Miller, Elise Jordan, Amanda Carpenter, George Will, Max Boot, Susan Del Percio, Jennifer Rubin, Sarah Longwell, Mike Murphy, Mark Salter, and Ana Navarro (apologies for those I missed) still believe in Republican tenets. They haven’t suddenly decided that raising taxes is the way to go or that the 2nd Amendment should be severely restrained or that big government is favorable to small government. They have not become Democrats, they still subscribe to an up-by-the-boot-straps ethos, but, this time, they are willing to look past policy differences to character. And what they see is that the candidate with character is the Democrat, former Vice President Joe Biden.

As a Democrat, I thank each and every one of them for doing this. It is not easy. When we come out of this, when we have a President Joe Biden rather than President Trump, it will be they and thousands (millions?) of Republican voters who are the real heroes. They will be our Churchills and Roosevelts for getting us over the rainbow and back home. And I look forward to the day when Democrats are again debating policy with the likes of Charlie Sykes and Nicolle Wallace and Steve Schmidt, a day that will only come if we elect Joe Biden this November.

Read the Lincoln Project’s endorsement of Biden here.

Why I Like Mayor Pete for President

These are exciting times. What we do now, matters. How we move forward with structural and policy reforms and who we elect to lead us to a better place will have historic consequences. We must speak locally and nationally to the concerns of Americans who feel disregarded and taken for granted—people of color and whites who have in common feelings of alienation, detachment, and distrust, despite their contrasting stories. We must speak to the concerns of people from the cities and people from the country, Americans on the coasts, in the South, in the West, and in the Heartland. We need a leader who can convey nuance with precision, who can be a teacher, and who, though a student of history, keeps his or her sights aimed on what might be. What America needs is Pete Buttigieg as president.

I love this country, and I believe in us. One of our greatest strengths is our diversity because from it pours a wealth of innovation, inspiration, ambition, and, eventually, tolerance. We persevere with our founding principles of self rule, hard work, and dedication. We endure because of our humanity and our sense of obligation to one another. The next president of the United States must understand this, Pete Buttigieg understands this.

Voters, notwithstanding recent election results, often have a keen sense for what America needs, especially when those needs are most acute. We should listen to those who voted, and those who didn’t, as they cry out for leadership. Russia’s interference with the 2016 election was subversive and an act of cold war. It employed ugly propaganda to convince voters that, among other things, Democrats do not care about us and are cynically opportunistic and Donald Trump is “the real deal.” I don’t believe that any of this is true, but, here’s the thing, it often takes a grain of underlying truth to make a lie effective. Perhaps Democrats have unintentionally taken some voters for granted over the years or maybe we haven’t quite delivered on a generation of promises made. And Donald Trump, compulsive liar though he is, is emotionally transparent and did run on a vow to disrupt. Despite the unfortunate result, we should listen to the messages voters sent.

In every speech, in every interview, Pete Buttigieg tells me that he gets it. He understands that America’s political leadership has not helpfully addressed the needs of millions of voters. The daily stressors that wear on us: traffic, child care bills, health care bills, education bills, substandard schools, unwarranted attention from law enforcement and worse, unappreciated dedication to a difficult job and worse, wages and salaries that can’t pay the bills, alcohol and drug addiction and PTSD, the ever-diminishing right to choose, the high price of housing, the low demand for domestic crops, growing threats of storms and droughts and fires, constant threats of terrorism foreign and domestic, unpaid maternity leave or no leave, limited freedom to be who we are, unequal pay or consideration, more traffic. These stressors affect each of us every day, taking their toll, knocking us off our game. While all of the Democratic candidates understand each of these stressors, Pete Buttigieg seems to grasp the bigger picture, how together they demand a fresh approach to governing, how voters are crying out for something new.

The United States, and much of the world, is at a crossroads. In this age of philosophical, social, and technological transition, the choices we make now will determine who we will be for many, many years to come. I recognize in Mayor Pete a vision and mission I can embrace and a manner I have missed.

Buttigieg’s approach to voters and issues, how he emphasizes what individuals need from their government, is compelling because it exhibits a penetrating impartiality that has the potential to heal our country’s great rifts. This refrain from judgment when addressing demographic groups and his sense of history while looking forward makes Buttigieg stand out from the crowd. The way he connects with people from all walks of life, all backgrounds, all interests, from everywhere, this is the stuff of great candidates. The way he looks at old problems through a modern frame of reference and has a creative sensibility, this is the stuff of great leaders. And the way he dances with Trump is masterful. Combine these rare qualities and abilities with a mayor’s appreciation for practical innovation, and you get someone special, someone new.

As Buttigieg says, where there is nostalgia in the past for some, there is pain for others. Even if we had come from a utopia, you can’t ever go back. Change is certain, for better or worse. We need someone who not only recognizes this, but who embraces it and is able to convey to the American people an excitement, maybe even anticipation.

Mayor Pete has the ability to build bridges, rhetorical and real, to a better America. Pete Buttigieg is the best candidate for president.